A much nicer term for building products using AI Agents than the almost derogatory term Vibecoding
The bottleneck in AI-assisted development is not code generation. It is specification quality.
faros research findings 2026
- findings
- AI is now the standard, not the experiment
- Thrashing and cognitive load are increasing
- Output is up. Not all of it sticks.
- Code changes are getting larger and more complex
- Code quality before merge is declining
- The workflow is slowing down at every stage
- Poor quality code is reaching production
- recommendations
-
- Measure your incident-to-PR ratio and your monthly code change volume against monthly incidents.
-
- Define a review policy. Then enforce it as a gate.
-
- Set PR size guidelines for your coding agents and enforce them.
-
- Build quality gates into the development environment, not the review queue.
-
- Use workflow stage times as input to a continuous retrospective process.
-
- Watch work restarts as a signal about agent context quality.
-
- Distinguish between human and agent review comments and act on both differently.
-
- Build an automated investigation loop around code churn.
-
- Repurpose engineering capacity. Do not reduce it.
-
- Build a context engine for your engineering environment.
-
- sources https://pages.faros.ai/hubfs/AI_Engineering_Report_2026_The_Acceleration_Whiplash_Faros.pdf
toolkits
- BHIL-AI - AI first development kit https://github.com/camalus/BHIL-AI-First-Development-Toolkit
- Drift - Docs to Code binding skill https://github.com/fiberplane/drift